Late on Wednesday evening, June 3, revelations regarding one of the world’s most beloved sporting institutions aroused the curiosity of a global fanbase.
This news, reported by Bloomberg, revealed that members of the Glazer family are debating whether or not to sell their stake in Manchester United Football Club after more than two decades of financial mismanagement.
The publication claims that family stakeholders are exploring divesting part or all of their holdings, with some members attempting to convince others to join.
Coincidentally, the prospect of such a significant event with worldwide ramifications caused United’s New York-listed shares to climb seven per cent in extended trading.
These deliberations have arrived nearly two and a half years after Jim Ratcliffe purchased his 28.94 per cent stake, handing the Ineos chief control of sporting operations.
Are the Glazers actually prepared to walk away from Manchester United?
Following years of protests, the 20-time English champions have been forced to fight with one arm behind their backs, dealing with an abundance of incompetence at the boardroom level.
Once a perennial juggernaut of the European game, supporters have seen United’s annual debt rise, witnessed ludicrous transfer dealings, and endured unforgivable neglect of the club’s historic infrastructure.
Ratcliffe’s arrival presented the possibility of sporting change and a shift in fortunes to counter the club’s fiercest rivals’ success.
Truthfully, despite the upturn in form under Michael Carrick since January, the jury is still out on the minority owner.
Scrutiny has rightly surfaced following widespread cost-cutting measures, including job cuts affecting working-class people and further ticket price hikes amid significant financial issues worldwide.
All the while, supporters have witnessed several high-profile departures, including Dan Ashworth and Ruben Amorim, who received severance packages totalling millions.
Nonetheless, it would appear as though Ratcliffe’s intentions are in the right place, and it wouldn’t appear that he was attempting to make money from the football club.
But it is impossible to ignore the fact that the Ineos group has been scrambling to cut costs and reduce its debt following a sustained downturn in the global chemicals industry.
Therein lies the question of how the billionaire would fund a potential move for majority or total ownership should the Glazers finally walk away from Manchester.
Additionally, a clause in the purchase agreement could require Ratcliffe to sell his minority stake as part of any full takeover agreed by the American majority.
A potential sale would inevitably attract interest from a variety of suitors, including wealthy U.S. consortia and Middle Eastern parties—all of which would provide plenty of cause for understandable concern.
United’s shares trade around $21 on the Stock Exchange, giving the club a market capitalisation of roughly $3.6 billion.
Crucially, the entire Glazer family hasn’t yet decided to sell up. Some remain opposed to a departure, and it will prove difficult to pursue a deal unless they come around.
For now, the United faithful must sit patiently and hope for a suitable conclusion that rids the club of its greatest issue.
Let us know your thoughts in the comments or across our socials.
(Photo by Craig Thomas/News Images via depositphotos.com)
Recent Posts
- The forgotten slow start to a glorious Manchester United campaign
- Manchester United officials retain confidence in Project 150 strategy
- Manchester United Supporters’ Club retain desire for change of ownership
2 responses to “Are the Glazers considering walking away from Manchester United”
We wait patiently
Shame they won’t hurry up, though.